On Saturday, September 7, 2019 at 12:14:07 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > > > On 9/6/2019 9:51 PM, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > I would put "Horganism" another way. > > > > Science tells stories/theories, and some are successful in their > > application. But we don't know if any of the stories are the final > > ones to be told, or even close to being final. (They probably are > > not.) There is no settled story of gravity yet, much less > > consciousness. One reads about a new story of gravity in science news > > every week, it seems. > > > > David Chalmers' conclusion is ... > > > > "I think that the Hegelian [dialectical] argument gives good reason to > > take both panpsychism and panprotopsychism very seriously. If we can > > find a reasonable solution to the combination problem for either, this > > view would immediately become the most promising solution to the > > mind–body problem. So the combination problem deserves serious and > > sustained attention." > > - http://consc.net/papers/panpsychism.pdf > > Zero predictive power and it's not clear that it's consistent with the > rest of neurophysics. > > Brent > >
Sean Carroll is on a nationwide speaking tour now evangelizing Many Worlds. What is the predictive power of Many Worlds? @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5e15cc52-6f5b-4f00-a77e-7cc6c3c63bcb%40googlegroups.com.
