On 9/11/2019 5:08 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 14:01, Bruce Kellett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 4:57 PM Quentin Anciaux <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The argument of the measure is based on ASSA and that's why it is flawed, moments are not random sampled from all possible moments, with this argument and without QI, you should have never find yourself young... But somewhere just before your death. ASSA is not a law of physics. I am not assuming random sampling from anything. It is just that you spend more time old than young given quantum immortality. That is not to say that you are never young -- of course you have to pass through all the years since your birth, one year at a time. It is just that there are more years after any given age than before that age.And so by this reasoning I must be old near death, and it's not the case, so something is wrong with your theory.
Or with the theory of quantum immortality and MWI. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4e2d2632-36d8-ea84-7f24-1e056dfd5738%40verizon.net.
