On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 at 03:12, smitra <smi...@zonnet.nl> wrote:

> On 11-09-2019 19:41, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 00:51, smitra <smi...@zonnet.nl> wrote:
> >
> >> Back to basics. There exists a universal wavefunction that evolves
> >> according to the Schrodinger equation. Observers are internal
> >> structures
> >> in this description. Whether or not one believes that the Born rule
> >> can
> >> be derived or not, what matters in practice is that you'll end up
> >> having
> >> to use it, so you have to assign a measure for observations that is
> >> given by the summation of the squared modulus of the states that
> >> correspond to those observations. The information about personal
> >> identity must then also be extracted from the wavefunction, so one
> >> cannot insert this in an ad hoc way.
> >>
> >> Quantum immortality is therefore wrong because the measure of the
> >> states
> >> that correspond to extremely old observers is small.
> >
> > This means that if you don’t know if you are young or very old and
> > have to guess, you are more likely to be right if you guess that you
> > are young. But it does not mean that you won’t inevitably become
> > very old.--
> Indeed, there is always going to be a very small probability of finding
> yourself in a very atypical situation. In the MWI we would need to take
> into account all possible relevant processes here, and forgetting about
> some fact and learning about that again will tend to replace extremely
> atypical information from he memory and replace that by more typical
> information.
> In the MWI the so-called stability of records of measurements is not
> valid in an absolute sense. It's only valid in each branch, but you can
> hop from one to another branch such that all your memories are swapped
> with those of your copy. So, if I find myself to be a trillion years old
> and I go top sleep then I'll most likely wake up as a copy that has that
> information about me being a trillion years old replaced by a more
> reasonable lower number.
> This also means that even if you win the lottery and become a multi
> millionaire, you'll very likely end up forgetting this and finding
> yourself to not having won the lottery.

I only survive because I remember the person I was. If a branch I find
myself in is a dead end then that version of me dies. So if I find myself
being a trillion years old and a trillion year old plus a day copy does not
exist, or exists but forgets he is me, then the trillion year old copy
dies. But if such a copy does exist with an intact memory, then the
trillion year copy survives in this copy. It is not an option that I switch
from a trillion year old copy to a younger copy with greater measure, any
more than it is an option that I will tomorrow wake up Chinese, because
there are more Chinese than Australians.

> --
Stathis Papaioannou

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to