On Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 12:00:30 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > > Physicists nowadays assumes much more, like ZFC, to get a base in all > Hilbert space, for example. > > Bruno > > > But in a real operational sense, that is not the case.
There is nothing in theoretical physics that is applied to matching what is observed in experiments or telescopes that depends on anything more than what *programs of computational physics* (computational/numerical relativity and quantum mechanics) can produce today on supercomputers in university and government labs. Show me any observational data that would refute this. @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/79cf1a58-4e9b-4ac7-9268-a015b5fedb30%40googlegroups.com.
