> On 4 May 2020, at 15:00, Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Am Mo, 4. Mai 2020, um 12:15, schrieb Lawrence Crowell:
>> On Sunday, May 3, 2020 at 10:14:10 PM UTC-5, smitra wrote:
>> On 03-05-2020 23:09, Philip Thrift wrote: 
>> > The SSH 
>> > 
>> >       https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/2/247 
>> > <https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/2/247> 
>> > 
>> > still lies in the "information turn" that plays in physics today.(IT 
>> > FROM QUBIT, etc.) - a rejection pf materialism in favor of idealism. 
>> > 
>> > It is more interesting to me to stick to the vocabulary of 
>> > materialist* physics - particles, fields, interactions, forces - but 
>> > to approach CONSCIOUSNESS AS PURELY MATERIAL - adding a new 
>> > force/interaction/particle/field as needed (like a sixth force/field). 
>> > 
>> > http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Field_theories_of_consciousness 
>> > <http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Field_theories_of_consciousness> 
>> > 
>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_theories_of_consciousness 
>> > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_theories_of_consciousness> 
>> > 
>> > etc. 
>> > 
>> > * or physicalist 
>> > 
>> > @philipthrift 
>> 
>> Physicalism is a dead end. The hard problem of consciousness and other 
>> philosophical problems can be considered to be no-go theorems against 
>> physicalism. Abandoning physicalism solves all these problems in one 
>> fell swoop. But that also opens the door to wrong theories as people 
>> engaging with non-physicalist theories can too easily advertise their 
>> pet theories because they don't suffer from all the diseases physicalist 
>> theories suffer from. The bar has to be set higher, I would like to see 
>> a derivation of the laws of physics, not some vague argument that it is 
>> consistent with QM and unitary evolution but a lot more detail than just 
>> that. 
>> 
>> Saibal 
>> 
>> I think more likely this mean the hard problem or qualia are illusions.
> 
> Isn't an illusion itself a qualia? Aren't you begging the question?

Yes. Consciousness cannot be an illusion, as a genuine illusion needs 
consciousness. LC’s remark does not makes sense. It looks like the usual 
physicalist attempt to put the mind-body problem under the rug.

With mechanism, it is the PRIMITIVE physical universe which is an illusion, and 
up to now, that illusion is explained by the number relation, except for our 
belief in numbers, which is still completely explained as being necessarily not 
explainable from less (or equivalent). That is why I claim that mechanism does 
solve the mind body problem, where adding infinities in the physical world just 
suggest a non mechanist theory of mind, which add difficulties without reason.

There are no evidence for a primitive physical universe. There strong evidence 
for the existence of a physical universe or physical reality, but no evidence 
for its pirmaryness, as the antic greek understood very well, when inventing 
Mathematics (a mathematician was a pholospher skeptic about he physicalness of 
the absolute reality).

Bruno



> 
> Telmo.
> 
>> I have far more confidence in physics than I do in hopeful ideas about 
>> qualia, which are psychological form of elan vital thought in previous 
>> centuries to underlie biology.
>> 
>> LC
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fc14bd06-c600-4e6a-abf1-b73943d36617%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fc14bd06-c600-4e6a-abf1-b73943d36617%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fb72afca-3b77-447d-88d2-65286e0fe542%40www.fastmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fb72afca-3b77-447d-88d2-65286e0fe542%40www.fastmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6AAB4946-3BA5-4D5A-B9C1-149412423D09%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to