As a strange loop consciousness may be an illusion having an illusion of 
itself.

LC

On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 6:17:29 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 4 May 2020, at 15:00, Telmo Menezes <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am Mo, 4. Mai 2020, um 12:15, schrieb Lawrence Crowell:
>
> On Sunday, May 3, 2020 at 10:14:10 PM UTC-5, smitra wrote:
>
> On 03-05-2020 23:09, Philip Thrift wrote: 
> > The SSH 
> > 
> >       https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/2/247 
> > 
> > still lies in the "information turn" that plays in physics today.(IT 
> > FROM QUBIT, etc.) - a rejection pf materialism in favor of idealism. 
> > 
> > It is more interesting to me to stick to the vocabulary of 
> > materialist* physics - particles, fields, interactions, forces - but 
> > to approach CONSCIOUSNESS AS PURELY MATERIAL - adding a new 
> > force/interaction/particle/field as needed (like a sixth force/field). 
> > 
> > http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Field_theories_of_consciousness 
> > 
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_theories_of_consciousness 
> > 
> > etc. 
> > 
> > * or physicalist 
> > 
> > @philipthrift 
>
> Physicalism is a dead end. The hard problem of consciousness and other 
> philosophical problems can be considered to be no-go theorems against 
> physicalism. Abandoning physicalism solves all these problems in one 
> fell swoop. But that also opens the door to wrong theories as people 
> engaging with non-physicalist theories can too easily advertise their 
> pet theories because they don't suffer from all the diseases physicalist 
> theories suffer from. The bar has to be set higher, I would like to see 
> a derivation of the laws of physics, not some vague argument that it is 
> consistent with QM and unitary evolution but a lot more detail than just 
> that. 
>
> Saibal 
>
>
> I think more likely this mean the hard problem or qualia are illusions.
>
>
> Isn't an illusion itself a qualia? Aren't you begging the question?
>
>
> Yes. Consciousness cannot be an illusion, as a genuine illusion needs 
> consciousness. LC’s remark does not makes sense. It looks like the usual 
> physicalist attempt to put the mind-body problem under the rug.
>
> With mechanism, it is the PRIMITIVE physical universe which is an 
> illusion, and up to now, that illusion is explained by the number relation, 
> except for our belief in numbers, which is still completely explained as 
> being necessarily not explainable from less (or equivalent). That is why I 
> claim that mechanism does solve the mind body problem, where adding 
> infinities in the physical world just suggest a non mechanist theory of 
> mind, which add difficulties without reason.
>
> There are no evidence for a primitive physical universe. There strong 
> evidence for the existence of a physical universe or physical reality, but 
> no evidence for its pirmaryness, as the antic greek understood very well, 
> when inventing Mathematics (a mathematician was a pholospher skeptic about 
> he physicalness of the absolute reality).
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
> Telmo.
>
> I have far more confidence in physics than I do in hopeful ideas about 
> qualia, which are psychological form of elan vital thought in previous 
> centuries to underlie biology.
>
> LC
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fc14bd06-c600-4e6a-abf1-b73943d36617%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fc14bd06-c600-4e6a-abf1-b73943d36617%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fb72afca-3b77-447d-88d2-65286e0fe542%40www.fastmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fb72afca-3b77-447d-88d2-65286e0fe542%40www.fastmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/af4d2e45-79e5-4b4d-8e82-fb19fa3d339b%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to