Self-reference is a case where the computation is not complete or can't be quantified. We might then consider consciousness as a strange-loop where the process can't be quantified, or any attempt to do so will always exceed the capacity of the processor.
LC On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:00 AM Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.net> wrote: > > > Am Mo, 4. Mai 2020, um 12:15, schrieb Lawrence Crowell: > > On Sunday, May 3, 2020 at 10:14:10 PM UTC-5, smitra wrote: > > On 03-05-2020 23:09, Philip Thrift wrote: > > The SSH > > > > https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/2/247 > > > > still lies in the "information turn" that plays in physics today.(IT > > FROM QUBIT, etc.) - a rejection pf materialism in favor of idealism. > > > > It is more interesting to me to stick to the vocabulary of > > materialist* physics - particles, fields, interactions, forces - but > > to approach CONSCIOUSNESS AS PURELY MATERIAL - adding a new > > force/interaction/particle/field as needed (like a sixth force/field). > > > > http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Field_theories_of_consciousness > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_theories_of_consciousness > > > > etc. > > > > * or physicalist > > > > @philipthrift > > Physicalism is a dead end. The hard problem of consciousness and other > philosophical problems can be considered to be no-go theorems against > physicalism. Abandoning physicalism solves all these problems in one > fell swoop. But that also opens the door to wrong theories as people > engaging with non-physicalist theories can too easily advertise their > pet theories because they don't suffer from all the diseases physicalist > theories suffer from. The bar has to be set higher, I would like to see > a derivation of the laws of physics, not some vague argument that it is > consistent with QM and unitary evolution but a lot more detail than just > that. > > Saibal > > > I think more likely this mean the hard problem or qualia are illusions. > > > Isn't an illusion itself a qualia? Aren't you begging the question? > > Telmo. > > I have far more confidence in physics than I do in hopeful ideas about > qualia, which are psychological form of elan vital thought in previous > centuries to underlie biology. > > LC > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fc14bd06-c600-4e6a-abf1-b73943d36617%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fc14bd06-c600-4e6a-abf1-b73943d36617%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAAFA0qo57yoD99OT-TYmxXVs4C1FODM%3DJSsKN4z%2BHNMRxEGN-g%40mail.gmail.com.
