On 5/20/2020 5:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 May 2020, at 21:35, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 5/18/2020 3:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 May 2020, at 00:45, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 5/17/2020 6:29 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
the appearance of matter as they are explained by the mechanist
consciousness flux in arithmetic (itself explained by G and G* and
their difference).
You frequently say this,
Yes, it is the PhD content.
1) UDA = the constructive reduction of the mind-body problem to the
necessity of deriving he physical laws from arithmetic.
2) AUDA = the derivation itself.
but I have not seen this explanation except in vague hand waving.
Hand waving?
Your remark does look like hand waving, I would say.
Come on Brent, I am the guy who gives 8 precise mathematical
theories, three of them being concerned with the appearance of
matter in arithmetic, and so are testable, and indeed confirmed by
all experiences until now.
They do not show the appearance of matter, the persistence of
objects, the shared reality. You merely assume that they
must...since otherwise your theory doesn't work.
UDA explains that there is no other choice. It exposes the problem.
No, it simply asserts the problem follows from some axioms.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/ea772e6f-71c5-9852-694e-b7044a9c0401%40verizon.net.
