On 7/24/2020 3:49 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Friday, July 24, 2020 at 4:38:20 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:

    On Thursday, July 23, 2020 at 10:03:36 PM UTC-5
    [email protected] wrote:

        If such a theory could be constructed, it would have particles
        to manifest excited states, called gravitons. But for a BH,
        gravitons generated by its mass couldn't escape, so they
        couldn't function as force carrying particles as in other
        quantum field theories. We'd still need Einstein's GR to
        account for the gravitational "force" via curvature of
        space-time. So what would a quantum theory of gravity buy us?
        Why do we need it? AG


    The way you state this illustrates considerable confusion and in
    these threads I and others have indicated how to think of this.
    This does not involve gravitons coming out of black holes. You
    have repeated this error a number of times.


You previously stated that gravitons cannot escape BH's. Do you stand by this claim? AG

Of course that's true.  If a double neutron star, which would be a source of gravitational radiation, fell into a super-massive black hole, its gravitational radiation would go futureward into the "singularity", not out.

But gravitons are the linearized infinitesimal wave solutions of gravitational perturbation.  The mass of the neutron double star would still add to the mass of the black hole and expand its event horizon.  From the standpoint of a distant observer, the gravitational effect of the (double star + black hole) is the same whether the former is inside the latter or just nearby.

Brent




    A weak low energy quantum gravitation is easy to derive. The low
    energy limit of gravitation is linear because terms in the
    curvature involving the square of connection terms are much
    smaller. This makes gravitation and gravitational waves linear.
    Quantization is not much different from quantizing electrodynamics
    in QED. The gravitational waves detected by the LIGO are long
    wavelength and with small amplitude. There should be signatures of
    gravitons there which would be linear. As the wavelength shortens
    the energy increases and as this approaches TeV and higher energy
    the nonlinear terms become appreciable. The nonlinear feature of
    gravitation, and that it is an exterior fibration so the field
    correlates direction with the quantum wave, means this is a
    nonlinear quantum mechanics, which is a contradiction of quantum
    mechanics.

    LC

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7480551c-f408-4db5-bc3c-aa5246b305a1o%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7480551c-f408-4db5-bc3c-aa5246b305a1o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/69790894-f196-c8dd-3497-53597f277b4f%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to