On 11/26/2020 4:28 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
The architecture they specify in their paper

             https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.09850.pdf

could be of interest to the AI hacker (MIT AI Lab type) trying to implement and demonstrate a "conscious" robot" (even just an impressively "fake" one).

/We agree with Christof Koch that “There isn’t a Turing Test for consciousness. You have to look at the way the system is built. You have to look at the circuitry, not [only] its behavior”. We would emphasize “architecture” over “circuitry”./

Then can they answer the question, "Is an octopus conscious?" Octopuses have a very different neural architecture.  Two thirds of their neurons are in their legs.  They have almost as many as a dog (5e8 vs 7e8).  They play.  They recognize individual people.  I'd say they are conscious...but then I'm only looking at behavior.  I curious as to what looking at architecture would contribute?

Brent


(But the "neuromorphic" might not just be architecture, but material composition.)

It is interesting that the presence of these artificial beings may be looked at differently depending on culture.

*Why Westerners Fear Robots and the Japanese Do Not*
https://www.wired.com/story/ideas-joi-ito-robot-overlords/

@philipthrift

On Wednesday, November 25, 2020 at 4:52:39 PM UTC-6 Lawrence Crowell wrote:

    On Wednesday, November 25, 2020 at 8:58:14 AM UTC-6
    [email protected] wrote:



        On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:17 PM Philip Thrift
        <[email protected]> wrote:

            > The Conscious Turing Machine
            arXiv:
            https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.09850
            <https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.09850>


            /DEFINITION 1.5.1. At each time t ≥ 0, Short Term Memory
            holds exactly one chunk, which is designated the entirety
            of Conscious TuringMachine's conscious content.
            Consciousness in Conscious TuringMachine is defined to be
            the awareness (i.e. the reception by all Long Term
            Memory). It defines the conscious content of Conscious
            TuringMachine to be whatever chunk is in Short Term
            Memory; and then defines Conscious Awareness by the
            Conscious TuringMachineto be the reception by all Long
            Term Memory processors of Short Term Memory's broadcast of
            that content. The gists of those broadcasts may be viewed
            as the inner thoughts generated by Conscious
            TuringMachine's unconscious processors or the speech,
            vision, touch, taste, and/or whatever else is received as
            input by the Conscious TuringMachine/


        Consciousness and awareness mean the same thing, so all the
        verbiage in the above could be boiled down to "Consciousness
        in Conscious Turing Machine theory is defined to be
        consciousness" which I don't find to be terribly helpful. And
        in the article I don't see even a hint as to how an
        experimental test could be performed to see if this "theory"
        is actually correct.

        John K Clark


    Blum defined a funny sort of meaning to incomputability, which is
    basically recursively enumerable. Blum stated this was
    incomputable because the computation would not halt and there is
    no final output. This differs from Turing's definition in that one
    cannot determine if all things halt or do not halt.

    The video is sort of long and I am not sure if I have the time to
    devote to this. This definition of inner thought being conferred
    to a system which exhibits the outward properties of a person
    known to have inner thoughts is not much different from the Turing
    test definition. This is couched in the definition of memory or
    long term memory as a cache of short term memories. This seems
    rather artificial to me.

    LC

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5389e90b-0d77-4d0e-800f-65c0b7fce3efn%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5389e90b-0d77-4d0e-800f-65c0b7fce3efn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2a7d05c4-5412-4db6-8b9b-ce0309eecb83%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to