On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 5:50:26 PM UTC-7 Brent wrote:

>
>
> On 2/3/2021 3:49 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 3:39:44 PM UTC-7 Brent wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 2/3/2021 12:25 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 10:55:13 AM UTC-7 [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 10:05 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>  
>>>
>>>> * > in GR universes evolve in time, but cannot instantaneously evolve 
>>>> faster than the SoL.*
>>>>
>>>
>>> In 1905 Einstein discovered Special Relativity and said nothing 
>>> whatsoever could move faster than light, but by 1915 he had found 
>>> General Relativity and had to amend that to some extent, he still insisted 
>>> that matter or energy or information cannot move through space faster than 
>>> light, but he placed no speed limit on how fast space itself can expand. 
>>>  
>>>
>>> *> In the MWI, worlds come into existence fully formed as it were, that 
>>>> is, replete with copies of observers. You want to have your cake and eat 
>>>> as 
>>>> well; that is, appealing to GR, but inconsistently instantaneously 
>>>> creating 
>>>> fully formed worlds, say like the one we live in. AG *
>>>>
>>>
>>> MWI doesn't say if a new universe is created instantaneously 
>>>
>>
>>
>> *IMO, it surely does! Deutsch makes a right turn in his car, and 
>> immediately another universe is created where a copy of Deutsch makes a 
>> left turn (and numerous other turns!). I see no way around this violation 
>> of GR. AG *
>>
>>
>> You need to think of better examples.  Something like Deutsch making a 
>> decision is with probability near 1.0 a purely classical event.  If it has 
>> some quantum component in its causation it was probably weeks earlier and 
>> in concert with thousands of classical effects.
>>
>> Brent
>>
>
>
> *It's just a thought experiment which makes the necessary point. Assume 
> Deutsch can take alternate routes with the decision depending on whether he 
> measures spin UP or DN. Would this work? AG *
>
>
> Sure.  Or the signal light is controlled by a Geiger counter.  It makes 
> the problem clearer and gets away from questions about consciousness.
>
> Brent
>

*Thanks. I'm interested in your opinion and possible analysis about whether 
the total gravitational energy of the universe is precisely ZERO.  AG  *

>
>
>>
>> or if the new creation only comes into existence at the speed of light; 
>>> it doesn't say because it does it need to, it works fine either way. MWI 
>>> Is agnostic about that. 
>>>  
>>>
>>>> *> If your claim that the net energy of the universe is zero is 
>>>> associated with the universe as a whole, not for some part of it, then it 
>>>> must be speculative. No calculation can be done to establish it.  Correct?*
>>>
>>>
>>> Correct, that can only be established through observation and 
>>> experimentation. However if General Relativity is correct and if empty 
>>> space does contain residual vacuum energy (both those things can only be 
>>> determined through observation and experimentation but the evidence is 
>>> piling up that both are correct) then the net amount of energy in the 
>>> universe is indeed zero.
>>>
>>> John K Clark 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8f21824c-c1d7-4dd2-98ca-c78da0969e80n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8f21824c-c1d7-4dd2-98ca-c78da0969e80n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>>
>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a54ec42e-24e9-4f11-89be-4f3d48ba6998n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a54ec42e-24e9-4f11-89be-4f3d48ba6998n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/91b55d70-2caf-40cf-9ecd-c8ed8bf51011n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to