I contend that there will be further studies which will adjust the death rate, however small it is, up or down. Corrections in medical studies always occur as new information and new methods become available. I didn't celebrate the article concerning the curative pill in my citation, Fauci did, which is why I sent it. The shots are a God send, or in your case, a Lysenko-sent vaccine. As the mechanics of human mitochondria become better understood, we as a species will employ even better medicines, post infection, in neutralizing the virus's effects.
-----Original Message----- From: John Clark <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Oct 4, 2021 4:20 am Subject: Re: NYTimes.com: Red Covid On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 9:01 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually JC, you don't read what I submit anyway. The difference between you and me is that I do read something before I submit it to the list, but now I know for a fact that you do not because the CDC link you submitted was making the exact opposite point of the point you were trying to make. > "I don't have time to read all that!" a quote. It's true I don't read every link you submit because I know from experience the more links you give in a post the less likely any of them are worth a damn. When I challenged you to give me one single example of corporate censorship you regurgitated about 12, I strongly suspected that you simply typed in the words "corporate censorship" into a search engine and then just copied out the first dozen links it churned out. My suspicion turned out to be correct because when I insisted you go through your long list and find the single strongest one for me to read it was indeed worthless because a book publisher declining to print a book by a known traitor is not an example of censorship, corporate or otherwise. Nobody, not even a traitor, has a constitutional right to demand that somebody else print their book. > Also the article did indicate that yeah there are people who suffer bad > reactions to the vaccines, and fortunately for us, these are very rare. They are incredibly rare, and none of those bad reactions turned out to be fatal. I very much doubt that new pill you like so much will have a lower bad reaction rate than the vaccine because I can't think of any medicine that has a lower bad reaction rate than the vaccine, not even aspirin. > A death is a death. I am sure your statements about vaccines will be > sufficient to condole the grieving and allay the fears of the reticent. > Yeah, Buddy! No, I'm not going to let you cover over ridiculous illogic and monumental stupidity with a thin veneer of emotion. 6.33 BILLION vaccine shots have been administered and not a single death has been unambiguously attributed to taking that shot, but 4,816,256 deaths have been unambiguously attributed to NOT taking the shot. Somebody must get to the other side of a deep gorge and there is a well-maintained modern steel suspension bridge over it, but they refuse to take it because however strong the bridge may be there will always be a non-zero possibility that it will collapse just as they're in the middle of it. They refuse to take the slightest risk even if it's infinitesimally tiny, but they must get to the other side so out of an abundance of caution they decide to ignore the bridge and get to the other side by jumping over the gorge on their motorcycle Evel Knievel style just to play it safe. If that's not an example of being as dumb as dog shit what the hell is? John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis cqx \ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1484814546.1079088.1633374635756%40mail.yahoo.com.
