On 4/28/2022 10:45 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:25 PM Alan Grayson <agrayson2...@gmail.com>
wrote:
/> The unresolved problem is that if you're using the frequentist
interpretation of probability, you must count and compare the
number of outcomes for each measurement possibility, but you can't
do this without knowing that the outcomes that result are *in* the
same Worlds. But for this to be true requires another axiom
imposed on the SE,/
Exactly what axiom would that be? It can't be the Born rule because
that is not an axiom, that is an experimentaly derived fact.
It was a guess by Born. If you want a measure on Hilbert space that
satisfies Kolmogrov's axioms of probability it must be Born's rule. The
axiom could be, "QM measurement results are probabilistic."
Brent
John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
ewb
3
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0tBQ9dh4kUEUukfy5RUROwuPWJdiE4TPBZkEL5-9_z_Q%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0tBQ9dh4kUEUukfy5RUROwuPWJdiE4TPBZkEL5-9_z_Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/306db751-cfb8-c2fe-71be-b0c22ca7c25c%40gmail.com.
