On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 11:21 AM smitra <smi...@zonnet.nl> wrote: > > The issues with branches etc. are likely just artifacts with making > hidden assumptions about branches. At the end of the day there are only > a finite number of states an observer can be in. If an observer is > modeled as an algorithm, take e.g. Star Trek's Mr. Data then it's clear > that there are only a finite number of bitstrings that can correspond to > the set of all possible things Mr. Data can be aware of. >
Everett is supposed to be QM without observers. So the number of things that Mr Data can possibly be aware of is irrelevant. According to the SE, all branches are equivalent. All else flows from this -- there are no further "hidden assumptions about branches". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQbZrov9a6Xs5mrr0o%3DkFSmeSHKdLG%3DbwgkOF6er43RKQ%40mail.gmail.com.
