Me: Forget acronyms, or even Einstein's gravitic Reference Frame dragging (His movie reel analogy), Instead ask yourselves are these physicists correct in proposing that some black holes are wormholes? Objects We Thought Were Black Holes May Actually Be Wormholes, Scientists Say (futurism.com) For this science fiction boy, I say interesting and maybe, hopeful? Let the hard science Bohr flavor of quantum mechanics and relativity yield for in objection, how this is fictional, improbable, and crapola? For reference frames, I know Einstein locked this in with time, which he discussed with Michele Besso (remember the letter to Beso's family?) but otherwise, how valuable to astronomers and physicists is ref frame dragging and all that? Does it predict do you think? The validity of a science is its ability to predict-Vanevar Bush.
-----Original Message----- From: Alan Grayson <[email protected]> To: Everything List <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Nov 15, 2022 1:30 pm Subject: Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY. RA. On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 6:19:02 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:38 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: > IHA = ? I Hate Acronyms. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis 8gfk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a67cbbac-69e0-40a9-8ee2-8e0caeb344d5n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2142008288.338975.1668539879975%40mail.yahoo.com.
