On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 07:37, spudboy100 via Everything List < [email protected]> wrote:
> To get to the point, I did advocate for a bit of skepticism for claiming > consciousness for a computer system, and the retort was from JC that > essentially, we cannot even define what makes a human conscious, and I am > going with an au contraries', Pierre! I took me under 10 min to locate a > worthy article submitted for JC's criticisms. > > Here tis' > > What Neuroscientists Think, and Don't Think, About Consciousness - PubMed > (nih.gov) <https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35280212/> > > So, we are much closer to understand human consciousness. I am ask to to > put the same effort into how a network developed this in so little time. > Our our analog chips so mighty in 2022-3??? > What produces consciousness is consciousness-associated behaviour. If it’s EM fields (it probably isn’t) then EM fields would have some effect on behaviour, and if this effect could be replicated by some other means, the consciousness would also be replicated. -- Stathis Papaioannou -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAH%3D2ypXKDU7uDj3UHaZXO-0pExsLgbANTcdM76KctK51PvCLSw%40mail.gmail.com.
