Up.

On Thursday 27 June 2024 at 17:43:15 UTC+3 Terren Suydam wrote:

> I offer this with all sincerity: I mean no disrespect, and I have nothing 
> against you personally. I do see why my comment about your paper being 
> "speculative" comes across as disrespectful, so please accept my apologies. 
> It's true that I haven't given your paper the attention required to make a 
> judgment like that. 
>
> If you're willing to continue with me, then please understand that I'm 
> someone who has to be pretty selective about how I allocate my time and 
> energy. Engaging with me means engaging with someone who is not going to 
> read your paper in its entirety until I know it's worth my time. Thus far 
> my comments/questions have been about testing to see if it *is* worth my 
> time. If *that* comes across as disrespectful, then let's just move on. 
> Otherwise, please give me the grace to come from misunderstandings that 
> need correction, and please correct my misunderstandings without resorting 
> to insults. And I will avoid jumping to conclusions. If we can do that, 
> maybe we can both benefit from a discussion. No hard feelings either way.
>
> Terren
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 5:17 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> @Terren. You clearly don't know to use the computer. For example, mouse 
>> has a wheel. If you use that wheel, page moves. When page moves, new things 
>> appear in the page. Like for example part 2 of the paper. Also, in case 
>> your mouse doesn't have a wheel, there is also a scrollbar on the right 
>> side of the window. If you click on that scrollbar and keep the click 
>> pressed, you can then move the scrollbar up and down. By moving the 
>> scrollbar up and down, new things appear in the page. Like for example part 
>> 2 of the paper.
>>
>> Also, the fact that you call it "speculative", only shows that you are 
>> full of hatred and are unwilling to engage. Then your presence is pointless 
>> on this topic. Why are you here ? To freely hate on people ? Pathetic.
>>
>> On Wednesday 26 June 2024 at 15:51:48 UTC+3 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>
>>> That paragraph is not in the paper you posted (here 
>>> <https://philpapers.org/archive/VISHSB.pdf>)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 3:25 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some might wonder, if we cannot speak
>>>> about it, why are we sure that it is the one that brings consciousness 
>>>> into existence. The reason
>>>> we can do this is because we observe the phenomenology of qualia (like 
>>>> inclusion and
>>>> transcendence of levels) and conclude that this is possible only if 
>>>> some entity that we call “self-reference”
>>>> must “exist”."
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't know what you mean by "inclusion" or "transcendance of levels", 
>>> so it's not clear why self-reference must exist for qualia. 
>>>  
>>>
>>>> I understand that we live in an age where attention span has been 
>>>> reduced to 5 seconds. Nothing wrong with that. But if that is your 
>>>> attention span, then you should employ it for tik-tok videos. Other 
>>>> subjects require a different attention span.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's just unnecessary. At least I'm engaging with your paper. And, for 
>>> what it's worth, I'm busy. Having something like Claude that can summarize 
>>> 17 pages of speculative philosophy is the only way I was going to do that. 
>>>
>>> Terren
>>>   
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 25 June 2024 at 21:32:24 UTC+3 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From your paper, you define self-reference as: "Let self-reference be 
>>>>> the entity with the property of looking-back-at-itself."
>>>>>
>>>>> Your definition invokes the concepts *entity*, *property*, 
>>>>> *looking-back*, and *itself*. That's a lot of complexity for 
>>>>> something that is fundamental.  It's easy for me to imagine *entities 
>>>>> *with different *properties* (i.e. that don't *look-back-on-itself), *but 
>>>>> only because I'm starting from a linguistic perspective that already 
>>>>> defines *entities *and *properties, *and *looking-back-at-itself.* 
>>>>> You don't have that luxury. If you want to derive everything from a 
>>>>> monism, 
>>>>> you cannot define that monism in terms of concepts imported from a 
>>>>> different metaphysics or conceptual framework. *Entities *and *properties 
>>>>> of looking-back-at-itself *must be defined relative to your 
>>>>> fundamental monism.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 2:04 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> @Terren. There is no "self" and "ability to reference". There is just 
>>>>>> self-reference. You can call it hampty-dampty if you want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday 25 June 2024 at 20:01:24 UTC+3 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I read enough to confirm that you postulate self-reference as 
>>>>>>> fundamental - the entity upon which everything else can be built. I'm 
>>>>>>> wondering how that can be fundamental if it requires two components 
>>>>>>> (self, 
>>>>>>> and the ability to reference).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:32 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The proper understanding happens by reading the paper, not by using 
>>>>>>>> hallucinatory objects to give you a devoid of meaning shortcut.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday 25 June 2024 at 16:42:11 UTC+3 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I used Claude Sonnet to summarize your paper. Tell me if any of 
>>>>>>>>> this misses the mark, but the paper appears to posit 
>>>>>>>>> *self-reference* as fundamental, upon which all other aspects of 
>>>>>>>>> reality are derived. 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If so (this is me now), my first thought is that self-reference 
>>>>>>>>> cannot be fundamental, because it already presupposes two distinct 
>>>>>>>>> components: a "self" and the capacity to "reference". Worse, defining 
>>>>>>>>> "self" (something to be derived) in terms of "self-reference" 
>>>>>>>>> (fundamental) 
>>>>>>>>> is circular. 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Terren
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 9:09 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List 
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I invite you to discover my paper "How Self-Reference Builds the 
>>>>>>>>>> World" which is the theory of everything that people searched for 
>>>>>>>>>> millennia. It can be found on my philpeople profile:
>>>>>>>>>> https://philpeople.org/profiles/cosmin-visan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4f13128c-5b63-422f-a6cb-4c3eb4f3618cn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4f13128c-5b63-422f-a6cb-4c3eb4f3618cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/ea01c75c-3cdd-4d9e-9ced-eb184ae03777n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/ea01c75c-3cdd-4d9e-9ced-eb184ae03777n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d91bb4ab-d34c-4508-9fa8-7278599ff78en%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d91bb4ab-d34c-4508-9fa8-7278599ff78en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/72e3472c-faf4-4cc2-b12c-b661189f4b98n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/72e3472c-faf4-4cc2-b12c-b661189f4b98n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e4dbcb1c-1219-4d8e-b87a-daa0e61ac228n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e4dbcb1c-1219-4d8e-b87a-daa0e61ac228n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/dce56be6-a391-41cd-a47d-f17bc131c69bn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to