On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 5:02 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:

*> But it* [Many Worlds] *assumes that the measurements by Alice and Bob in
> a Bell experiment can be uncorrelated;*
>

*The only assumption Many Worlds makes is that Schrodinger's equation means
what it says. If that assumption is correct then the entirety of reality
consists of a Universal Wave Function (UWF)**, it describes the position
and momentum of every particle in existence at any Instant in time. If a
human could observe things from the outside he wouldn't need to resort to
probability, but of course that is impossible because the human is also
part of the Universal Wave Function, and that's why humans need to talk
about "worlds" and have to resort to probability. Another name for the UWF
is "Multiverse". *

*So everything is always correlated with everything else because it's all
part of the UFW. However, not all correlations are equal. Sometimes, under
very unusual circumstances and for a very short period of time, a small
number of particles can become highly correlated with each other but have
very little correlation with the rest of the universe; when this rare state
of affairs occurs human beings say that the particles have "become quantum
mechanically entangled". *

*And everything I said in the above would still be true regardless of which
one starting condition the Multiverse started out in, it would even remain
true if the Multiverse had no initial condition at all because it was
infinitely old. *

*> while superdeterminism says their angle selections have a common source
> and are correlated. *
>

*In any quantum experiment Superdeterminism and Many Worlds make identical
predictions, the only difference is Many Worlds only needs one assumption
to make correct predictions while Superdeterminism needs to make an
infinite number of them. *

*And you still haven't told me why you think Superdeterminism is a
reasonable theory worthy of consideration but the Dinosaurs Never Existed
Theory is not. I'm assuming you believe that dinosaurs once existed, if I'm
wrong about that assumption please let me know.*

*  John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*
plk

> goe
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2UZrRE_gzRSGJ3GDfQ6RF54VMvr5MOirdXdtL%2BWAhWYg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to