On 11/27/2024 4:57 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 7:06 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:

        * >> It may require more calculating power than you have
        available**but Newtonian physics can give you an answer for an
        infinite number of initial conditions, and if things are not
        too fast or too small and gravity is not too strong the answer
        will even be correct; but superdeterminism can only give you
        an answer if things started out in one very specific starting
        condition. *

    /
    > Who told you that?  It's not t'Hooft's theory.  He just says
    suppose there is no free will and no randomness, all evolution is
    deterministic. /


*Bullshit. *
You think that is *not* t'Hooft's theory?  Or superdetermism can only produce one outcome if things start is specific condition?
*First of all free will is not false, it's gibberish. And _ANY_ deterministic theory, not just Superdeterminism, would say there is "/no randomness, all evolution is deterministic"/;  for example Many Worlds says exactly the same thing because it is also a deterministic theory. *
But it assumes that the measurements by Alice and Bob in a Bell experiment can be uncorrelated; while superdeterminism says their angle selections have a common source and are correlated.  It is not just the evolution of the experiment that is determined but also the action of the participants and decisions about what to measure.  That's why it's *super*determinism.*



*
*What makes Superdeterminism unique, and uniquely stupid, has nothing to do with determinism, it has to do with the unique starting condition required to make the stupid contraptionwork.*


    *>> All the other rival quantum interpretationswill work
    regardless of which particular initial condition the universe
    started out at, they have no need of specifying one particular
    one; by contrast what superdeterminism says is let's assume the
    universe did NOT start out in that state, or that state, or that
    state, or that state and it must continue making those assumptions
    an_infinite_ number of times before it finally gets to one and at
    last says yeah it started out in that one.*

    /> A simple consequence of deterministic evolution, which is time
    reversible./


*Brent, I assume you don't believe in the "Dinosaurs Never Existed" theory, but why not? If things are deterministic then out of the infinite number of initial conditions the very early universe could've started out in, there is one in which nonbiological purely geological forces would produce rocks that sentient creatures on a small planet around an average looking star would misinterpreted as being bones from huge reptiles that existed many millions of years ago. If Superdeterminism is a good theory then "Dinosaurs Never Existed" is an equally good theory. *

        *>> The laws of physics are not the problem,and determinism is
        not the problem. The problem is the initial conditions, out of
        the infinite number of initial conditions the universe
        could've started out in only one of them will guarantee that
        experimenters everywhere will always make the wrong choice
        when performing their quantum experiments, even when they use
        dice or quantum "randomness" on how to set their polarizers or
        Stern Gerlach magnet**s because nothing is really random. *


    >///In what sense is the choice wrong if it is determined by laws//?**/


*It's wrong because the sequence of orientations generations of experimentalists "chose" to set their polarizers and Stern Gerlach magnets at were _ALWAYS _the one and only one *
It doesn't imply that Alice and Bob must chose some particular settings, only that their choices OR the spin axes be correlated.

Brent

*that will cause generations of theoreticians to form incorrect quantum interpretations, such as Copenhagen, Many Worlds, Objective Collapse, Pilot Wave and many more. * *John K Clark    See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*
goe
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv16GUNO%3D4je28MQfOXQrVo-nuruXetWEGQ8YdfW6aQwiw%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv16GUNO%3D4je28MQfOXQrVo-nuruXetWEGQ8YdfW6aQwiw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b615db80-0ca9-4250-975b-d4361702ca61%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to