It started with a question I had about the singularity within a BH which results from the from the gravitational collapse of a massive star. If such a singularity exists, why don't the usual suspects voice any anxiety, as they do with the hypothetical singularity at the BB, when GR breaks down with density divervging?
Yes, I know; Roger Penrose received a Nobel Prize for answering this question in the affirmative. But then I wondered; how can such BH's exist in Nature when there is a breakdown of GR within them? I mean, if these singularities really exist, how can we affirm that the BH's related to them, exist? How could they exist without any blowback from the usual suspects? The answer is surprising; Penrose was wrong! Don't take my word for it. (First link below must be downloaded.) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375744216_Do_Black_Holes_have_Singularities https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/singularities-dont-exist-roy-kerr/ AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9068f256-49f1-4318-806c-5156dff49bban%40googlegroups.com.
