On 2/24/2025 9:18 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, February 24, 2025 at 3:47:05 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 2/24/2025 8:09 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Sunday, February 23, 2025 at 11:26:32 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote:
On Sunday, February 23, 2025 at 9:38:50 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 2/23/2025 6:18 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Sunday, February 23, 2025 at 5:58:51 PM UTC-7 Brent
Meeker wrote:
Sir Roger readily admits that there is no
singularity, in spite of his theorem. His theorem
applies to GR without consideration of quantum
mechanics.
Brent
There's no guarantee that a quantum theory of gravity
will ever be developed. What then? AG
We've done without one for 300,000yrs. Life goes on.
Brent
I think we can *rule* out a singularity without invoking
quantum gravity. A singularity in the interior of a BH, would
represent an inherent contradiction, and thus not be
physically realizable. I speculate a repulsive fifth force of
Nature that would prevent the contracting mass to achieve
zero volume. AG
Brent; what do you think of my "proof" that a BH cannot have a
singularity in its interior? If it did, it couldn't be physically
real! AG
I agree with it. Physical things like curvature, can't be infinite.
Brent
So, Penrose and Hawking left us twisting in the wind, while we wait
for a quantum of theory of gravity, when the answer was in front of
their respective noses. AG
I'd say the question was in front of their noses. We don't know the
answer to how general relative merges with quantum mechanics.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8fc0daf7-bda5-4fba-9050-997fa495e372%40gmail.com.