Sir Roger readily admits that there is no singularity, in spite of his
theorem. His theorem applies to GR without consideration of quantum
mechanics.
Brent
On 2/23/2025 2:37 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
It started with a question I had about the singularity within a BH
which results from the from the gravitational collapse of a massive
star. If such a singularity exists, why don't the usual suspects voice
any anxiety, as they do with the hypothetical singularity at the BB,
when GR breaks down with density divervging?
Yes, I know; Roger Penrose received a Nobel Prize for answering this
question in the affirmative. But then I wondered; how can such BH's
exist in Nature when there is a breakdown of GR within them? I mean,
if these singularities really exist, how can we affirm that the BH's
related to them, exist? How could they exist without any blowback from
the usual suspects? The answer is surprising; Penrose was wrong! Don't
take my word for it. (First link below must be downloaded.)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375744216_Do_Black_Holes_have_Singularities
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/singularities-dont-exist-roy-kerr/
AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9068f256-49f1-4318-806c-5156dff49bban%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9068f256-49f1-4318-806c-5156dff49bban%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1c26e02c-fef5-486f-9cb9-7739b7e0d400%40gmail.com.
