On Monday, February 24, 2025 at 3:47:05 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 2/24/2025 8:09 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: On Sunday, February 23, 2025 at 11:26:32 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote: On Sunday, February 23, 2025 at 9:38:50 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: On 2/23/2025 6:18 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: On Sunday, February 23, 2025 at 5:58:51 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: Sir Roger readily admits that there is no singularity, in spite of his theorem. His theorem applies to GR without consideration of quantum mechanics. Brent There's no guarantee that a quantum theory of gravity will ever be developed. What then? AG We've done without one for 300,000yrs. Life goes on. Brent I think we can *rule* out a singularity without invoking quantum gravity. A singularity in the interior of a BH, would represent an inherent contradiction, and thus not be physically realizable. I speculate a repulsive fifth force of Nature that would prevent the contracting mass to achieve zero volume. AG Brent; what do you think of my "proof" that a BH cannot have a singularity in its interior? If it did, it couldn't be physically real! AG I agree with it. Physical things like curvature, can't be infinite. Brent So, Penrose and Hawking left us twisting in the wind, while we wait for a quantum of theory of gravity, when the answer was in front of their respective noses. AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f36c55d5-1b57-4300-b861-4c0ecd9351a7n%40googlegroups.com.
