On 2/24/2025 8:09 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Sunday, February 23, 2025 at 11:26:32 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote:

    On Sunday, February 23, 2025 at 9:38:50 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:



        On 2/23/2025 6:18 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


        On Sunday, February 23, 2025 at 5:58:51 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker
        wrote:

            Sir Roger readily admits that there is no singularity, in
            spite of his theorem.  His theorem applies to GR without
            consideration of quantum mechanics.

            Brent

        There's no guarantee that a quantum theory of gravity will
        ever be developed. What then? AG
        We've done without one for 300,000yrs.  Life goes on.

        Brent

    I think we can *rule* out a singularity without invoking quantum
    gravity. A singularity in the interior of a BH, would represent an
    inherent contradiction, and thus not be physically realizable. I
    speculate a repulsive fifth force of Nature that would prevent the
    contracting mass to achieve zero volume. AG


Brent; what do you think of my "proof" that a BH cannot have a singularity in its interior? If it did, it couldn't be physically real! AG

I agree with it.  Physical things like curvature, can't be infinite.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/aef575e8-0e77-4b24-a39a-afe84eabc611%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to