This would work of course, but they will be limited to 2GB of space for the PST so they may run into having to have multiple PST's. Still, make sure they know it is their responsibility to back up the files, unless you have a system to back up your workstations.
> ---------- > From: Kim Schotanus > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 6:13 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: options > > I fear that I will run out of disk space very fast on the server. They > all have 20 GB free on their workstations, how about setting up a pst > folder on their D-drives, then they can drag the mails into that one? > > Kim > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: vrijdag 19 september 2003 13:04 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: options > > > Why not a publilc folder? You know the access on these can be limited so > each "pair" has their own folder that no one else can see let alone read > content from. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 19 September 2003 09:39 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: options > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > I have been asked to think about a way to implent a kind of > > policy for keeping emails. > > Our users work per two, i.e. a scientiific officer and an > > assistant. They get a lot of emails about certain projects, > > but after a while emails get lost, people don't know who > > replied etc... > > > > Now they want a system where the two people working together > > establish a sort of directory structure in which they can > > create a folder per project and keep all correspondance in > > there (not as a public folder). The lifespan of a project can > > be up to fice years so the volume of emails will be quite > > big. We have about 10 'couples' like that and what they want > > to dio is put eachother in CC for each response/received > > email, so that's already a duplication. > > > > Problem is that the diskspace on the E2K server has about 10 > > GB left so I'm worried about that fact, and I don't know > > whether using the archive function in Outlook (XP) is a good option. > > > > Does anyone want to share their opinion on this? Maybe some > > of you have faced a similar problem? > > > > Kim > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&la > ng=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
