Tony Finch wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, W B Hacker wrote: > >>David Woodhouse wrote: >> >>>Btw, your MUA is misbehaving -- your replies have neither In-Reply-To: >>>nor References: headers, so they're not associated with the thread to >>>which you replied. Please could you fix that so that you don't break the >>>threading on the list? >> >>Pipermail (online archives) handles that well enough, and Mozilla Mail has no >>problem at all with it. Which MUA is not following it? > > > Actually, pipermail does show the problem: if you look at this thread in > the archive you will see that your reply to David is not indented further > to the right under David's message, so from the thread structure it > appears to be a reply to the original message. > > References-based threading is not the same as sorting messages by subject. > > Tony.
I don't sort by subject unless looking for something like last year's license key, but never mind. From inspection of the archive, I think I see the sort of problem it is causing for those with less thread-aware MUA's, and am happy to fix that. So - which ONE (or TWO?) of the rather large number of sesame's extraneous X-Headers should I issue a pass for in the router/transport sets these hit? (archive deliveries, inbound and outbound, preserve them all, but on-box and remote smtp deliveries strip them) Regards, Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
