On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 06:35:38PM +0800, W B Hacker said: > Tony Finch wrote: > > > > References-based threading is not the same as sorting messages by subject. > > I don't sort by subject unless looking for something like last year's license > key, but never mind. > > From inspection of the archive, I think I see the sort of problem it is > causing > for those with less thread-aware MUA's, and am happy to fix that. > > So - which ONE (or TWO?) of the rather large number of sesame's extraneous > X-Headers should I issue a pass for in the router/transport sets these hit? > > (archive deliveries, inbound and outbound, preserve them all, but on-box and > remote smtp deliveries strip them)
Why are you stripping In-Reply-To and References and so forth anyway? I can't immediately imagine a reason for doing it. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | BOFH excuse #257: That would be | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | because the software doesn't work. | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
