Marc Sherman wrote: > > How about the geekspeak "noop"? > > I'd think that that would be more like a comment, and would be surprised > to see a "noop" condition expanding its arguments for side effects.
Maybe expand_with_noop or expand_and_ignore? I think it'll be tricky to pick a single "verb" that will convey the effect it has without potential confusion. Regards D. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
