On Sat, 01 Mar 2003 07:00, Ron Stodden wrote: > Simone Riccio wrote: > > Dear Ron, > > html is of course nice 2 see and maybe look professional but please > > consider that not everyone on this list has broadband, and goes on > > with 56Kbps modems. So, that's more than a cosmetic or geek or old > > fashion thing... It involves respect for those who can be eased by the > > lesser size of text messages! > > The greater size of html messages causes me, for one, no extra cost or > problem, and all I have is an old age pension - nobody could be worse > off for resources. > > html does not require broadband, since it makes no perceptible > difference in message download time. >
UTTER TRIPE The overhead of HTML alone approximately doubles the size of an e-mail, and then HTML can be used to embed so many different objects <IMG SRC"http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/gemini/gemini11/hires/s65-58504.jpg";> Ah - don't try this link folks. It is a 5.5 Meg pic. Dang i hope this doesn't start loading into everyones client. > So, in what way 'eased'? -- Michael
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
![http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/gemini/gemini11/hires/s65-58504.jpg"](http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/gemini/gemini11/hires/s65-58504.jpg"){kind=link}