On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 12:43, Mark Weaver wrote: > Michael Adams wrote: > > On Sat, 01 Mar 2003 07:00, Ron Stodden wrote: > >>Simone Riccio wrote: > >>>Dear Ron, > >>>html is of course nice 2 see and maybe look professional but please > >>>consider that not everyone on this list has broadband, and goes on > >>>with 56Kbps modems. So, that's more than a cosmetic or geek or old > >>>fashion thing... It involves respect for those who can be eased by the > >>>lesser size of text messages! > >> > >>The greater size of html messages causes me, for one, no extra cost or > >>problem, and all I have is an old age pension - nobody could be worse > >>off for resources. > >> > >>html does not require broadband, since it makes no perceptible > >>difference in message download time. > > > > UTTER TRIPE > > The overhead of HTML alone approximately doubles the size of an e-mail, > > and then HTML can be used to embed so many different objects > > <IMG > > SRC"http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/gemini/gemini11/hires/s65- > >58504.jpg"> > > > > Ah - don't try this link folks. It is a 5.5 Meg pic. Dang i hope this > > doesn't start loading into everyones client. > > who are those guys and what are they grinnin about?
LOL i went to NASA looking for a 10MB TIF, They have reorganised the pics recently and so i found this instead. This is the crew of one of the gemini missions. Imagine the size of this as a tif. Hopefully leaving out the "=" in the SRC attribute prevented it loading for anybody (netscape Mail users?). -- Michael
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
