John,

The point is that the unit you suggested can not be used. Rotor, hub, etc.
You can't get the weight savings you espoused in your email. The difference
between a cast iron VW rotor and that steel rotor, I would imagine, would be
significant. Can't tell, don't have those two units in front of me.

Art

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Whitling
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 12:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [F500] FM Autocrosser ALERT!

And the difference in weight between cast iron and steel? Not much, and you
know, I haven't spent more than 5 minutes researching it .. how much time
did you guys spend and how in the world can anyone think that replacing
those large cast steel drums with discs and aluminum hubs will weigh
more???????????????????? Have you ever even picked up a backing plate for
these cars? Very heavy.

Art wrote:

>John,
>
>That setup uses steel rotors. Check out D.3.5 which requires cast iron 
>rotors.
>
>Glad you have studied the proposal.....
>
>
>Art
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
>John Whitling
>Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 12:26 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [F500] FM Autocrosser ALERT!
>
>Art
>The existing drums and backing plates are over 17 lbs a corner right 
>now. Go to this link and you'll see a hub, disc, caliper assy that weighs 9
lbs.
>
>http://www.cncbrakes.com/cncbrakes.com-asp//dbk.asp?grp=dbk&subgrp=r&se
>ries=
>645&subseries
>
>Glad to see you guys have thoroughly looked into the consequences ..
>
>Art wrote:
>
>  
>
>>John,
>>
>>Chuck and I are not berating you, we are just challenging your posts 
>>concerning outlandish claims of 145 HP Solo Vees and now, the added 
>>claim of a 30# rotating unsprung weight savings if they go to discs.
>>John, you really need to check your facts. Discs will add weight, not 
>>reduce it. VW drums are very small and light. Any VW vendor can supply 
>>that information as can any VW engine builder supply the needed 
>>information on engine performance with the mods we have suggested. If 
>>you want that information, we feel it best that you do your own 
>>research because it is obvious that you don't/won't believe anything 
>>we
>>    
>>
>tell you anyway.
>  
>
>>So John, we are comfortable with the information we have gathered but 
>>the only way you will be comfortable is to check it out yourself :-).
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>You would think they wouldn't be so defensive about this.
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>What, you want us to ignore outlandish bogus information based upon, I 
>>can only guess, emotion and not facts? :-) I don't think so.
>>
>>Art
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
>>John Whitling
>>Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 11:17 AM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: [F500] FM Autocrosser ALERT!
>>
>>Dave
>>Scott did not have a co driver in 06, or any other year. In addition, 
>>in
>>06 he tried a radical front tire on the first day, so his first day 
>>times weren't very good. I was pitted right beside him and witnessed 
>>it all. And his second day nats times were pretty good. He was also 
>>the fastest FM car in the test day before nats with his usual tire 
>>setup, and if you know Scott, you know that he reminded us all of that 
>>all week.  BTW, the top four cars in the class were two driver cars. 
>>It made a huge difference. I guess solo has now become a "team" sport.
>>
>>This whole idea of engine changes and limited slips being allowed is 
>>just stupid, IMO. I'm sure Art and Chuck will claim otherwise and 
>>beret me like they have anyone who has posted against these rules 
>>have, but do a simple comparison between existing FF (C mod) rules of 
>>110 hp, no limited slip, 1100 lbs weight, narrow narrow wheels and 
>>cantilevered tires to those of the new Solo Vee and you get at least 
>>130 hp, limited slip, weight of 975, and unlimited wheels and tires. 
>>It just makes no sense. Much less so the comparison of the 500 cars 
>>with go cart axles and not even shocks or springs.
>>
>>I agree with all the chassis stuff for the Vees. That's where the 
>>concentration should be to equalize the field. Just the disc brakes 
>>are going to take 30 lbs of rotating unsprung weight out of the cars 
>>and make them much more neutral handling because they can now balance 
>>corner entry with brakes like we do ... add to that the cambered front 
>>ends and you have significant improvements. Also I agree about the 
>>Formula
>>    
>>
>First chassis.
>  
>
>>After all it's in the chassis where the two cars are far apart, not
motors.
>>The Vees have never been out powered by the 500s.
>>
>>It looks like the SEB/MAC just gave all the Vee guys anything that any 
>>one of them asked for. If the SEB/MAC feels that these are good rules 
>>maybe they should share the info they used to base all these changes 
>>on rather than require us to hustle out to Vee engine builders, etc 
>>and start from square one all over again. Instead all we get is a 
>>bunch of crap from them about how we should go do research now and 
>>fight these changes with a letter writing campaign. You would think 
>>they wouldn't be so
>>    
>>
>defensive about this.
>  
>
>>Certainly Stan didn't treat the road racers that way last year.
>>
>>Dave Phaneuf wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Did Scott have a co-driver in 2006?
>>>I heard you were screwed without one.
>>>Maybe tire warming blankets should be legal?
>>>Dave Phaneuf
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a 
>>name of
>>    
>>
>
>[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a 
>name of

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of
________________________________
FormulaCar Magazine - A Proud Supporter of Formula 500
The Official Publication of Junior Formula Car Racing
Subscribe Today! www.formulacarmag.com or 519-624-2003
_________________________________



_______________________________________________
F500 mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change options please visit:
http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500
*** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***

Reply via email to