I actually would have to agree with Chris here, i got out of f500 simply
because i hated getting to a race and flipping a coin weather or not the
motor would fire. As for bike motors, ive since gotten into legends cars,
and every single car i went and looked at, even the ones kept outside and
were in the worst shape you can imagine, fired first try. Ive also bought 2
complete fj1200 motors for 1400 dollars. Brand new shocks are 100 each. And
if we didnt have a spec tire, theres alot more choices on a 13" rim. And
they're 15k new. So why cant f500 add a 600cc bike motor and a adjustable
shock/spring setup and not control costs?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Reinhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: [F500] Official 2007 participation data


> Why would they not be as simple with bike motors?
>   There would no clutch to tune, no jets to monkey with, and if guessed
wrong now, squeak!!!!
>   There's no temperamental 2 stroke....
>    Sorry, the only logic that follows is that it may be more simple
because people are used to the shuffle, and afraid of the unknown....
>
>   CR
>
> fmod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   Because with a bike engine these cars will not be the simple formula car
> that they are now.
> If I wanted a car with a bike engine I would find a Formula Ford that
needed
> an engine and gearbox and put a bike motor in it! That would lower the
cost
> big time for driving a car like that.
> But putting the bike engine in a F500 will bring out all the extra cost
that
> everyone forgets they get started on the car of their dreams. Before I
> would put a ton of money into my 89 Zink I would take that hard earned
money
> and find one of the newer cars like Jay's or from Q!
>
> Also, there are places I have run in a Solo II (non SCCA events) were in
the
> average F440/F500 you always want both hands on the wheel. In Solo II not
> shifting is the way to go in these cars! Every you shift you add fractions
> of second which is the difference between winning and loosing!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Reinhardt"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 11:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [F500] Official 2007 participation data
>
>
> > Bob, not to be an ass, but why do you think the sowmobile 4 stroke cvt
> > would be cheaper???
> >
> > fmod wrote: John there is no one cheaper than me, but
> > many of us went to F440/F500 not
> > just for the 2 stroke engine, but the CVT! If I were a younger man and
> > were
> > going to me in this for another 20 years, I would push for the 4stroke
> > snowmobile engine very hard! It will not be easy to come up with the
> > correct size or engine to use, but by staying with the cvt concept it
> > would
> > still be a lot cheaper than going to a motorcyle engine!
> >
> > Bob Jordan
> > #5 NER SCCA fmod
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Vriesinga"
> > To:
> > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 9:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: [F500] Official 2007 participation data
> >
> >
> >>> Wrong, the real starting point is considering which 4 stroke snowmoble
> >>> engine with cvt that we or future F500 owners are going to want to
> >>> use!!!!!!!!!!!
> >>
> >> I'm cheap. 8-)
> >>
> >> I figure it would be cheapest to get a motorbike engine, but a 4 stroke
> >> snowmobile engine could be interesting.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > TV dinner still cooling?
> > Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Finding fabulous fares is fun.
> Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and
hotel bargains.
________________________________
FormulaCar Magazine - A Proud Supporter of Formula 500
The Official Publication of Junior Formula Car Racing
Subscribe Today! www.formulacarmag.com or 519-624-2003
_________________________________



_______________________________________________
F500 mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change options please visit:
http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500
*** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***

Reply via email to