> > Just to clarify, I didn't actually read that much > > of it. > > Yes that was clear, that you didn't read the post. The post was > substantially about experience. And that is why your post had the > appearance of a hampster (per Judy's cross-post) -- or one flailing > their arms in the dark. It surprised me, made me laugh, because your > posts thus far, (and on AMT where I have read you in past years) > have appeared informative, reflective and well considered.
That's called Maya...it'll pass as you get to know me. :-) Another way of saying it is, when a person requires 322 lines to make their point, the level of attachment to the point he's making doesn't exactly inspire me to reply. :-) I'm not terribly attached to *any* POV long enough to debate it for very long these days. I can start a discussion from one POV and be in the opposite POV by the time the other person has replied. A lot of people, *especially* in the TM movement, seem to get off on discussing the intellectual fine points of theories *about* enlightenment. These days I tend to find that uninteresting, that's all. It's kinda like the difference between a long, involved discussion of the nutritional and spiritual qualities of various foods and styles of food preparation and presentation vs. just enjoying a good meal. :-) I said about all I have to say on the subject in my first reply. I think it's a 'both/and' situation, not 'either/or.' Just different passing states of attention, none more valid nor 'higher' than another. I tend to think relationally, not hierarchically. Unc To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
