Right on, Jimmy! Thou shall not kill.
Pretty simple to understand, almost impossible to be perfect at. I'm going to get a half a coconut shell, a diaper and a walking staff. Can you imagine the first-person-I-went-up-to's response as I begged for my daily ration of rice? It seems just about impossible to be a good person if there's a car in the garage, an article of clothing in the closet, or even "eggs for breakfast." I keep searching for the words to turn my life around when I need a good dose of seeing just one child die in a ditch in Dafur. Who can claim integrity in today's world? Only in the poorest places might we find such a person. Who's looking? Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mainstream20016" > <mainstream20016@> wrote: > > Equality with men who advocate violence against the innocent is not > virtuous. Both > > women and Kelts have been degraded by your argument. > > > If abortions were the only so called violence against life, and > killing on this planet, I'd agree with you 100%. But there's a few > things I can't get past: > > Those that advocate preventing abortion are often the same ones a-ok > with war. All I can say is, wtf? That's just crazy talk on their part. > > Also many women having abortions feel like crap about it, not like > scoop me out doc, let's go have a latte. Its their bodies and their > responsibility. What about all those million or so innocent sperm that > die every time a man ejaculates? which brings me to my final point: > > If someone is advocating not to take the loss of so called innocent > life, but restricts it to human life or quasi human life, then what > hypocrisy. Where is the vegan diet, vinyl shoes and belt, and Jain > face mask to avoid inhaling insects? > > Anyway that is the gist of my thinking.:-) >
