You may keep your opinion. I shall keep mine. I have studied Nazi Germany formally and exhaustively. Moreover, I am well prepared for scholarship and scholarly research with years of training. I've also talked with scores of people who've been through it. A "New Age," or, more specifically a Vedic component, was an aspect of German fascism and was part of its design from its inception in the Thule Society. It wasn't only Vedic, however. Meister Eckhart was big, and so was Buddhism. These things diverted attention from the political arena, so that the dictator's noose tightened too much before anyone could really notice enough to object.
I've noticed that folks in this forum like to call one another stupid without actually knowing anything in any depth about what's being discussed. It is possible to question and challenge ideas without resorting to words like "silly" and "stupid." authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Have you actually studied the history of Nazi Germany? Not formally in a classroom, but I've done quite a bit of reading about it. > You are right in thinking that "whatever the people of a country are into, a Hitler could take it and run with it," but this is not what happened in the case of Nazi Germany. Do you actually know how carefully Goebbels designed his propaganda machine or how closely the educational system, the media, and the entertainment world were controlled and designed to create what I have described down to the aesthetic? a How is this different from what I said that you just agreed with, Angela? Nazism took advantage of what the German people were involved in and institutionalized it, based their propaganda on it, distorting it wildly in the process. That could have been done with *any* cultural phenomenon to end up with a fascistic dictatorship. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com