Vaj, that is bullshit. Plain and simple. While workers who worked to get their programs really worked hard, they sometimes got to their goal. Before MMY made them all recert. But just because some suckers got passed over they still had the kundalini supporting them. You can't say Ma was wrong. So let some steam out of the old pie hole. You're gettin old and cranky. Starting to remind me of this WW2 vet. All he talks about is how he never had the opportunity to kill a real live Germain.
----- Original Message ----- From: Vaj To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 8:59 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vaj the honest and forthright On Feb 23, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote: Curtis wrote: When India elects a Sudra as their leader they can brag too. There are no 'sudras', Curtis - you're just perpetuating the myth like you were trained to do. But in fact, almost all of India's leaders have been dark-skinned. According to friends who worked on staff at MIU for very low wages, and supposedly to get on course, i.e. pay for the TM-Sidhi course, they were treated like shudras, like lesser-evolved people, who shouldn't be touched or engaged. The idea, they felt, was that more evolved people would naturally receive the "support of nature" and so they were naturally more prosperous. If you lacked money to the extent that you had to (essentially) beg to get on a course or be able to hang at MIU/ meditate in the domes, you were in effect (not only a slave of sorts), an untouchable. Or at least that's the way they felt they were treated. It's an unspoken caste system in the same sense that racism can be covert and engrained without necessarily needing out loud racial slurs or comments. Perhaps we should start calling it the apaurusheya-jati?
