Vaj wrote: > > On Apr 7, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Bhairitu wrote: > >> What would the Muslim world have to gain from the attacks >> anyway? > > > Cause a hawkish US President of questionable intelligence to, as a > knee-jerk reaction, go into a war which drains the nation, forcing > it's economy into a tailspin AND gain support for recruiting > worldwide? The RADICAL Muslim world would have a lot to gain. The > moderate and progressive Muslim world would have a lot to lose.
That's a rather superficial point of view. It is entirely possible the whole thing was a false flag operation but I wouldn't be surprised if Dubya was out of the loop. False flag operations have been used throughout history to cause wars or make money for the war profiteers. They are pretty much standard operating procedure. The military industrial complex was hurting after the Cold War ended. They needed a new war to bolster their sagging profits. There were corporations and banks under scrutiny too (and those records conveniently got destroyed during 9-11). I think they all co-conspired with rogue right leaning military to create 9-11 and use the Arabs as patsies. It just makes too much sense that way and the "official story" does not. The whole think looks like it was cooked up by a think tank (complete with plan B, C, and Ds) and not by a bunch of Arabs in caves. As for Muslims, just like any other religion 85% of them pay lip service to it. Some I have known were only "born" Muslim and never practiced it. Muhammad invented Islam to rid the area of war lords back them. Now we find ourselves once again saddled with war lords and need to get rid of them. In this time the big war lords are the military industrial complex. We don't need a religion to do this, just the truth.
