--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Richard M" <compost1uk@> wrote: > > > > Let's call the Turq docrine about opinion "TD". > > > > TD seems to be something like "Truth is relative to your > > point of view and there is no Truth (capital 'T')". > > Not at all. You are making the same reading error > that the rest here are. I stated my position very > clearly: I don't *think* that there is any such > thing as "absolute truth." But I am willing to be > convinced otherwise. All you have to do is produce > one. Just one. > Would that mean that an observeable fact might not always be true? For example- we live for varying numbers of years and, then we don't. Has anyone seen it differently? >
- [FairfieldLife] FFL and the Contradictions of Relativism emptybill
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the Contradictions of Relativi... TurquoiseB
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the Contradictions of Rela... Richard M
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the Contradictions of ... TurquoiseB
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the Contradictions... authfriend
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the Contradictions... Richard M
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the Contradic... TurquoiseB
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the Contr... authfriend
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the Contr... Nelson
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the C... TurquoiseB
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the C... TurquoiseB
- [FairfieldLife] Barry's not intel... Duveyoung
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the C... authfriend
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the C... Nelson
- [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL and the Contradictions of Rela... authfriend
