--- In [email protected], "wayback71" <wayback71@...> wrote: > > > > turquoiseb (Barry Wright) -- You guys can write this one. > > > It's only fair. :-) > > > > Okay, let me take a shot at it. His afterlife is a daily > > running over Edg on a Trikke, then going to have lunch > > with Curtis, and dinner with Marek. Being asked to lecture > > on the superior qualities of Sitges, Sedona, Paris, > > Amsterdam, and Santa Fe (not necessarily in that order). > > Discovering ever new Bruce Cockburn compositions. > > I would add to the above that he would have unlimited > airline miles so he can travel, that he has a weekly > column in a major newspaper or publication where he can > write about his ideas and also interview anyone from any > time in the world, that he can have dinner once a week > with his dearest friends from all over, and that he gets > the inside scoop on all the brain research being done > over the next 500 years.
Thanks for all the flashforwards of future lives. Since the very question of "future lives" is as much speculation as the Apocalypse, I'll just try to be happy with whatever happens. If that turns out to be a loud "Click" and then blackness, so be it. If it turns out to be another life in another world even a tenth as beautiful and interesting as this one, well that's just gravy. Also thanks to all involved for the ongoing discus- sions of "What happens after you die enlightened." It appears that Maharishi tried to straddle the fence and take both sides of the issue, at one point or another in his life. So he contradicted himself. Big deal. Some seem uncomfortable with that, as if one or the other "has" to be "what he taught," or as if one or the other can be true, but not both. Silly wabbits. There are probably as many different versions of Reality as their are subjective realities. The arrogance lies in trying to declare any one of them Truth.
