--- In [email protected], tartbrain <no_reply@...> wrote:
>

> Yes, we want to see your papers, Herr Curtis! There are some reported 
> hoodlums and lower rogue elements masquerading as self-realized beings. We 
> have orders to shoot these frauds on sight.
> 
> Remember Herr Curtis, you can't simply bask in the joy of your own existence. 
> You must be certified to do so. And enjoying life without proper papers and 
> titles, impossible!

Ya vol mein herr!

The first rule of spiritual one upmanship is that MY self-realization is the 
right one, and yours is the wrong one. 

The second is, if you dont't use the authorized names to describe it that I 
do,then your self realization is relative and superficial, and mine is absolute 
and deep.

The third rule is never talk about fight club.  Wait a second, that is supposed 
to be the first rule, sorry! 







> 
> --- In [email protected], "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Curtis, my responses below:
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" 
> > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How do you know what someone in CC, GC, or UC perceives, or doesn't? 
> > > 
> > > Same way I know what anyone does, by what they express. 
> > > 
> > > > Seems like you, Curtis and Vaj enjoy wasting your time speculating 
> > > > about self realization, without any attempt to accomplish it 
> > > > yourselves. 
> > > 
> > > I am self realized.
> > 
> > Which state of consciousness please (CC, GC, UC)? 
> 
> Yes, we want to see your papers, Herr Curtis! There are some reported 
> hoodlums and lower rogue elements masquerading as self-realized beings. We 
> have orders to shoot these frauds on sight.
> 
> Remember Herr Curtis, you can't simply bask in the joy of your own existence. 
> You must be certified to do so. And enjoying life without proper papers and 
> titles, impossible!






> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >If you are indeed self realized, this should be a gimme for you.
> > <snip>
> >
>


Reply via email to