> MMY basically said that unless you can perform the siddhis at any time, you
> can't really lay claim to being in Unity.
>
> RESPONSE: He did indeed say this. He even said it on my Six Month Course
(where I purportedly entered into a different state of consciousness).

Funny thing, I was never convinced that MMY was enlightened. I was never
convinced that he could perform the siddhis better than I could. It certainly
seemed plausible, but I'm a skeptic through and through.

When I heard my Siddhis Administrator respond to the question: "Can MMY float?"
with the answer: "One might assume that since he is teaching others how to do
it, that he can," my reaction wasn't "Oh, that means he must be able to do it!"

My reaction was: "MMY told him to say that. What a clever way of sidestepping
the answer to the question."

Your own answer, that I snipt, appears to be that you believed your state of
consciousness to be such that you didn't need to validate it for yourself, but
my own take is that were I to be having such internal experiences, my natural
agnosticism would compel me to attempt to validate things, were there such a
trivial validation available. You didn't feel the need. I would.

Lawson

RESPONSE: No, Lawson, I very much did need to validate it for myself. But you 
see, Unity Consciousness validates itself—I wrote 11 books about this: either 
about Unity Consciousness directly, or about world events as seen through the 
perspective of my enlightenment.  (All these books, what remained of them, 
after I disavowed the reality of enlightenment, were destroyed. But some of 
them are floating around.) Regarding world events, if you want to get a dose of 
what enlightenment can do for you, see my description of meeting Ayatollah 
Khomeini. That will demonstrate the biased perception that enlightenment 
produces in a human being. (You can read it on the Internet.)
Of course I thought of this "trivial validation" [can you perform a siddhi], 
but, believe it or not, when you are under the delusion of enlightenment YOUR 
LIFE IS NOT YOUR OWN. When I contemplated subjecting my enlightenment to this 
very test, immediately I was aware of a much larger and unfathomable context 
within which my consciousness was being held (I thought it was reality; it was 
not), which insinuated silently to me: Forget it. This (being able to perform a 
Siddhi) means nothing. And the very idea that anyone would believe it was 
relevant to the consideration of enlightenment was ironic in the extreme (this 
impression I deem now to have been the mentality of these Vedic gods—who, 
believe or not, 'owned' me at this point in my life—I believe Maharishi was 
owned in this same way, only he didn't get the gratuitous grace that I did to 
realize the whole damn thing was cosmic bull****—too bad for him).

No, enlightenment represented a complete and radical break with everything I 
had ever known as to 1. my identity 2. my consciousness 3. my actions 4. my 
experience of myself in the act of existing itself. And everything that 
occurred on that mountain in Arosa, Switzerland in September 1976, scrupulously 
and gloriously conformed to everything Maharishi had said about what Unity 
would be like. I wrote a three hundred page book about the experience (What is 
Enlightenment? Sutras of The Personal with Commentary). A very bad book by the 
way. But holy cow, Lawson, put it this way: when the event happened NOTHING WAS 
THE SAME. And the powers and abilities that were bestowed upon me in those 
seconds, were intoxicating and incredible. But, as it were—take this the right 
way—I was a plaything of the gods. And I nearly did myself in because of this. 
Although it took ten years for the hallucinatory reality of Unity Consciousness 
to start to come off. And then by cracky, life was hell—for the last 24 years 
this is what it has been. Although the metapsychotherapeutic methods I have 
applied seemed to have been effectual.

You understand, then, that I am prejudiced, biased, antagonistic towards the 
idea of Unity, enlightenment, self-realization. What counts for me is the 
person only, not one's 'state of consciousness'. But I could give you a 
thousand meaningful criteria (based upon Maharishi's teachings) that proved 
that I was in Unity Consciousness. Have you tried LSD? Enlightenment is much 
more powerful. Albeit a state of supreme mystical deceit.





Reply via email to