--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote:
>
> 
> On Jun 21, 2011, at 3:36 PM, maskedzebra wrote:
> 
> > RESPONSE: No, Lawson, I very much did need to validate it for myself. But 
> > you see, Unity Consciousness validates itself—I wrote 11 books about this: 
> > either about Unity Consciousness directly, or about world events as seen 
> > through the perspective of my enlightenment.  (All these books, what 
> > remained of them, after I disavowed the reality of enlightenment, were 
> > destroyed. But some of them are floating around.) Regarding world events, 
> > if you want to get a dose of what enlightenment can do for you, see my 
> > description of meeting Ayatollah Khomeini.
> 
> 
> Would your meeting with Keith Jarrett be an equal dose of blessed-tragic 
> unity?
> 
> Didn't he tell you to "fuck off" or something similar? He read your book and 
> then you laid some sort of trip on him backstage -- he bailed?
> 
> Is that just carpet burn from going against the grain of the cosmos? Ouch!
> 
> What about Werner Erhard?
>
RESPONSE: Keith Jarret reacted strongly, vehemently to the artificial silence 
emanating from the people I was with (after his performance): they 
unfortunately deferred way too much to me and to KJ. He apparently felt this 
was stupid, and said so. Although he had previously invited me up to his room 
at his hotel because of his experience of reading one of my books. In 
retrospect I thought his response providential and appropriate: had he not had 
this negative experience, he would have (based upon our previous private 
conversation in his hotel room), been drawn into the context of a cult. So, as 
fate would have it, he was spared this complication. Best album: Koln Concert 
(1975).

Werner Erhard? That was intense, even violent. I stood up to ask him a question 
when he was giving a lecture to an inside group (I had been given secretly an 
invitation by some subversive within his organization—at that point called 
est), and he physically attacked me. Werner is used to imposing his authority; 
I found what he was saying untrue, and within my enlightened integrity I was 
going to challenge him. He sensed this, and made sure he and his henchmen kept 
me from speaking. Of course this is MY version of the event. You might want to 
hear the POV of those loyal to WE. I think everything to do with Werner 
extremely problematic, and the effect on the mind of his seminars (now called 
Landmark Education) mystically inhibiting and even dissociative. He has it all 
wrong, even though his trainers (those who conduct the Landmark Education 
seminars) are deceptively clear, strong, and confident personalities. But they 
too are victims of his metaphysical system, which, when analyzed carefully is 
the biggest reality rip-off that I have known. See? I have my prejudices, but 
in the case of Werner, I think that prejudice well-founded. People are subtly 
brainwashed at Landmark Education: and I wonder whether any of them fully 
recover. Whatever my enlightenment turned out to be, it was enough for me to 
know that I could place Werner inside a context where his teaching could be 
exposed as contradictory to reality. He is a formidable character to confront. 
But in a very different way from Maharishi, I believe with all my heart he is 
terribly mistaken in his idea and experience of what reality is. And my 
experiences of talking with anyone who has taken the est or Landmark training 
is that he or she is dislocated from the person they really are. It's pretty 
deep, the matter of WE. You have to get experimental knowledge see through what 
he and Landmark Education is all about.

> 
> I get the feeling you fell for the placebo and are still trying to convince 
> everyone else it's still pure Pfizer. But then that's always been the dilemma 
> of the awakened TM teacher or die-hard TM lover: can they stop projecting 
> some scripts from the TM screenplay onto their own (supposedly autonomously 
> Self-produced) "enlightenment"?

Don't think I entirely understand what you are saying here, Vaj. Perhaps you 
could pose the question a different way. Oh, by the way: my enlightenment, it 
was REAL. 
>


Reply via email to