Yes you are right, I did take offense and I was waiting for Denise to
leave before responding - poor lady didn't want to scare her. I have
also read your other posts, I felt that you are indeed a complicated
egoist much fascinated with your intellect but I wasn't so sure so I
just lobbed a little something at you. I would love to be proven wrong
in my assessment. I appreciate your thoughts and the irony. To clarify
your other comments - no, I don't consider myself a Hindu though I have
lot of Hindu conditioning, you are free to hate the Hindus - wouldn't
bother me a little bit and yes the beloved is the Self.

--- In [email protected], maskedzebra <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks, vajradhatu. I watched the first 50 minutes—and learned a
lot.
> I appreciate the tip. I think I now know what's up—more or less.
> RY took offence at my challenging the ultimate personal integrity
(knowing who she is, knowing what reality is) of his guru. (My response
to the account of an Amma Retreat.)
> One thing for sure, RY is very sincere in his spirituality.
>
> --- In [email protected], Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, maskedzebra wrote:
> >
> > > Hey, Ravi Yogi, I'm new to FFL. I probably should read some of
your
> > > other posts before responding to this one. However, I just want to
> > > say it: You really know how to hurt a guy. I am sure you're right
> > > that I am an egoist, but could you explain what it is about this
> > > response to CurtisDeltaBlues that reveals this so decisively?
> > >
> > > After all, if I thought someone would see through me so easily and
> > > expose my inward cunning (and narcissism) to the world like this,
> > > well, I would never have posted anything. I need, I suppose, a
> > > "beloved" like you have—What pray tell COULD be the beloved I
could
> > > "stay home with" so as to relinquish this illicit infatuation with
> > > myself?
> > >
> > > Seriously, Ravi Yogi, I merely wish to know what there was about
> > > that response to CDB that disqualified me in your eyes from
> > > contributing something honest and serious to this conversation?
> > >
> > > You see, from this response here (the one I am making right now),
> > > that I am very determined to not have any of the readers of this
> > > blog find themselves agreeing with you. That could prove
> > > devastating to me—and my shaky self-esteem. After all, the
beloved,
> > > is that the Self?
> > >
> > > Excuse the very limited perspective I have, having not read your
> > > other posts. But I sure will read them NOW, after you have
revealed
> > > me to be what I have always secretly suspected I was. It feels
good
> > > to enter this next phase of my life knowing the truth about
myself.
> > >
> > > No, Jesus Christ, Ravi Yogi: You gotta tell me in what way I
> > > unwittingly f****ed up in this response to the hard-hitting and
> > > entertaining CurtisDeltaBlues.
> > >
> > > Otherwise I am likely to become hostile to all Hindus. And I am
> > > sure you are a nice guy. Just a little too powerful and accurate
in
> > > your put-downs of us de-Hinduized fellas.
> >
> >
> > I believe Ravi did an interview at Buddha at the Gas Pump where he
> > talked about his enlightenment.
> >
> > http://batgap.com/ravi-chivukula/
> >
>

Reply via email to