On 06/24/2011 10:00 AM, turquoiseb wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71"<wayback71@...> wrote: >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, maskedzebra<no_reply@> wrote: >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blastedactresses<no_reply@> wrote: >>>> "Nevertheless, his basic questions are relevant:" >>>> >>>> ( "relevant"? who says what is "relevant"? you and maskedzebra?) >>>> >>>> " The fact that you did not reply to them is odd." >>>> >>>> ( Who is it "odd" to? >>>> >>>> Who says that it IS in fact "odd", you? >> :I just wonder what the answers to those 3 simple questions >> are and why you are choosing to not answer them, that's all. >> Because you don't answer them, I wonder if you are in fact >> an est, forum or Landmark grad or here specifically to defend >> WE. > For the record, I now assume that this is true, not > only because blastedactresses is avoiding the question > completely, but because he/she only appeared on this > forum when MZ mentioned Erhard. > > ON THE OTHER HAND, I've rarely seen a meltdown > to match MZ's. As I've said before, if it weren't for > mentions of him on this forum I wouldn't have any idea > who Robin Carlson was or is; I had left the TMO long > before he made any loud-frog-in-a-small-pond splash > there. But based on his performance here so far, I'm > inclined to go with those who described him during > that period as nuts. > > First Rick asked some pretty simple and non-threatening > questions of him, and the guy *ignores* the questions > completely and then goes off about all the assumptions > Rick is making about spirituality, enlightenment, what- > ever. And then the drama queen histrionics when I give > him a little ribbing for being such a solipsist that > he doesn't even know when he's being boring. And now > all of this "missionary" crap and hanging on to a > decades-old grudge and paranoia. Gotta say it...Dude's > a loon in my book. > > Sorry, MZ, but you brought it on yourself. I actually > *agree* with some of the things you've said here about > UC not being any kind of ultimate state of consciousness, > but too much is too much. It's not just that you're a > drama queen; it's that you're being a douche. Over and > out.
I just love the circus of "me toos" that emerged on the spiritual or guru scene in the 1970s. One that popped up was run by one of my high school buddies who was our student body president and a jock at the university we both attended. I had to laugh when I actually ran into someone "very involved" with his organization.
