--- In [email protected], blastedactresses <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> "Mein Gott!  This guy can write coherent sentences if he sets his mind to it. 
>   I'm sure the bag ladies will jump all over your description as the utmost i 
> brutality, but I grew up in something of a rough and tumble world.  
> IMOthere's more much ado about nothing, as usual.   But I can see how ver 
> important this is to you and therefore should be important to the known 
> world.  You are such a special person.  Being ejected out of a room, 
> physically.  Such a crime.  It's clear you've carried the hurt of this 
> grievous assault against your person and retold the story many times.
>  
>  The observation by another poster says it all.  This is a tough audience 
> here on FFL.  You must be in great desperation because we're not all groupies 
> gathered at your feet oooing and aaaahhing at your every word.  A leader 
> without followers.  What a desperate situation to be in."
> 
> ( RESPONSE: People often get what they  ask for  in life and then cry a river 
> for the rest of their lives.  
> 
> If a person sneaks into a  private party uninvited , get together  or 
> important gathering of  anyone's  and starts  undermining the host   or the 
> invited  guests or the intent of a private get together  and  refuses to 
> leave  ...what might  be the result? 
> 
> The  crazymaker   can then act surprised but  most settings would  respond 
> dramatically and enforcement would be  swift  and  they  should not be 
> shocked  when they  hit the ground  outside hard or end up in a situation 
> that is not warm and fuzzy for them. The world does not revolve around them  
> and their  self-important world views. 
> 
> And then they act innocent and victimized about it.)

RESPONSE: I continue to see Red ba. And if you don't wish me to form a fixed 
judgment of you (to the detriment of my objective perspective on this 
conversation), please—you should be proud of your communist affiliations—(under 
what circumstance would anyone be persuaded to tacitly deny their 
religion?)—LEVEL WITH US.

Otherwise you are like the mother quail on the road, only interested in drawing 
us off from our prey.

I think this an extraordinary indictment of the Werner universe that you 
experience that it would be to your extreme disadvantage to admit you are a 
Landmark graduate—and a TB because of this. WERNER'S CONTEXT SHOULD BE 
APPLICABLE TO ANY CONTINGENCY, BLASTEDACTRESSES, and see the dilemma that 
context now presents to you.

Shouldn't happen if it is true to reality. Because this is just reality coming 
at you.

And you are rendered powerless, because admitting you are an est graduate (or 
equivalent) is experienced by you to be tantamount to the invalidation of your 
credentials to continue to argue on behalf of Werner, and against what I have 
said.

See how Werner's context has ironically put you in a greater straitjacket than 
you were in before you went through the training. You have no answer to this, 
blastedactressees.

You can only feint in some other direction.

I am sorry for you, and I do reach out to you. 
>


Reply via email to