Sorry, you will have to find someone else to play with, Barry. I cannot take you seriously enough to address your question.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> wrote: > > > > Barry takes authenticity and honesty, or their lack, as > > tools for manipulating responses from others on here. > > That is his entire game; using his writing skills to > > plant emotional triggers in his posts calculated to > > set others off. > > > > He doesn't care if he said the exact opposite the day > > before, or makes stuff up. Its all about Hah - you > > flinched! That's it, and that's all there is. > > If that were true, and two of the historical criteria > of being either enlightened or "more highly evolved" > and close to enlightenment are non-attachment and the > ability to have external events have as little effect > on them as a "line drawn on water," what in your view > does "flinching" say about those who do it on a regular > basis? > > You came up with the description of me. You're one of > the biggest "flinchers" on this forum. Now explain > how your characterization of me, if true, reflects > positively on you and the other over-reactors. >
