Yes. I have no power, no shakti, whatsoever, but my particle-"I"s or devatas believe in me utterly, and in that faith they manifest whatever I tell or give them. Having no siddhis, I bestow all siddhis on them, and enjoy all things through them.
They are my Shakti, and I am their Shiva :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@...> wrote: > > I have no way of knowing, though perhaps Maharishi set this particular, and > practically impossible definition of UC to ensure that all of us understood > enlightenment or realization to be an ever expanding process, once we > experience our initial Awakening. > > Seems to me that particular sidhis go with particular nervous systems, much > as each of us becomes an engineer or doctor or circus clown. I haven't looked > for success with them, though my ability for subtle sight continues to grow, > as does my ability for healing through visualization of body energy. Nothing > I cultivate. Like I said it just happens. I wouldn't be at all surprised if > others found that a particular sidhi jumped out at them so to speak. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" <raviyogi@> wrote: > > > > Yo Lawson I wouldn't take MMY's words seriously. You may have some > > beliefs regarding what UC and full liberation is and I don't agree with > > it. TM is clearly a path of yoga with milestones, description and > > categories of enlightenment. The fact that I haven't heard one TM'er > > experience match all these shows that perhaps there's another reason why > > MMY would have gone to so much trouble to state all these. IMO he might > > have prescribed these understanding the Rajasic, goal oriented nature of > > the human mind. Other than a Jim here or a Rory there the literal > > interpretation of this has resulted in widespread prevalence of what I > > call pimps(intellectuals) among TM'ers totally fascinated with the whore > > (intellect). > > I don't think self-knowledge has anything to do with Siddhis, sure there > > seem to be varying degrees of self-knowledge based upon the external > > manifestation of it. According to their predominant samkaras - some > > become Gurus, some debate with others, a lot just continue in their > > respective professions, some just fall out of the society and wander > > enjoying their bliss. In either case I think I agree that full > > liberation would not be possible until you drop the physical body. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > > > Yo, William, don't take them too seriously. According to MMY, if you > > can't perform any and all of the sidhis (e.g. Yogic Flying) then you're > > not truly in Unity Consciousness. > > > > > > Now, for those who like to play semantic games with the above, I'll > > take it back a step: if, immediately prior to Full Liberation, you don't > > find yourself able to perform all the Sidhis to perfection during sutra > > practice during your participation in the TM/TM-SIdhis program, then you > > are probably not fully enlightened, no matter what your perceptions > > suggest. > > > > > > MMY himself once hinted that that was one of the reasons why he > > realized the world wasn't quite how it should be when he was off on his > > own, meditating after his guru dev died: he wasn't doing/experiencing > > some of the stuff that was predicted for someone in his apparent state > > of consciousness and finally concluded that the current state of the > > world's consciousness wouldn't support full enlightenment, and > > eventually set out to remedy the situation. > > > > > > L. > > > > > >
