--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote:
>
> Fun to watch Curtis (and Edg, but to a lesser extent
> because he isn't immediately involved) stand on his
> head to avoid seeing what's actually going on here,
> exercising his creative powers to the utmost to come
> up with an alternate story line that will allow him
> to feel less bad about himself.

So the mission of the sour plum is to help assist me feeling badly about 
myself?  So noble, so kind. So you.

> 
> Two hints: (1) Not looking for a guru in Curtis; and
> (2) anger *per se* isn't the problem. It's the Hulk-
> like transformation the anger triggers that's the
> problem. Or maybe Jekyll/Hyde is a better analogy.

Off my schtick for a moment here.  Your complaint is ridiculously pointed at me 
for the most human quality of reacting angrily to hostility and (what seems to 
me) unfair attack.  There is nothing hulk-like about this switch.  Posters get 
from me what they give.  Sometimes the switch is between a few different posts 
as with Jim who can start a rancorous debate and then in a few posts we are 
complimenting each other.  You more than anyone here has an agenda to get my 
goat and when you succeed you claim it as a personality defect rather than the 
natural reaction that you yourself share here.  You are trying to demonize me 
for trying to gain rapport with people here (that is being Mr. Wonderful) and 
then reacting defensively when attacked.  And a typical cycle of triggers is if 
any poster has a run of too many positive posts with me.  It seems to unhinge 
you.

> 
> At any rate, Curtis might find it of benefit to do
> some reading/thinking about Jung's recommendation
> to acknowledge and ultimately accept one's Shadow
> side. If you can make friends with your Shadow, 
> you're a lot more likely to get it to work with you
> rather than against you.

First of all please don't attempt to couch your malevolent intentions toward me 
as some kind of exercise in opening my eyes to greater self knowledge.  You 
don't have the empathy skills needed, or even the core level kindness toward 
other people that would be required.  You are not a people person Judy.  It 
reveals itself again and again in your low emotional intelligence displayed in 
your posts. 

And secondly, for you to chastise me for having "anger triggers".  From a 
person who is the most high maintenance, fly-off-the-handle on any given 
phrase, soaring on the wings of her self-righteous claim to moral superiority, 
often screechingly angry posters here,I say 

(re-engage schtick)

Sour, sour plum. 








> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Curtis,
> > > 
> > > Have you considered that Judy is like Guru Dev when he was looking for a 
> > > guru?  He got that one guru angry, and Guru Dev said something like:  
> > > "This guy's anger proves he isn't fully enlightened, so he's not the guru 
> > > I seek."  
> > 
> > Edg my brother, don't get me started again on the hideous story of a poor 
> > boy who left home searching for a "perfect" father sold as a wonderful 
> > spiritual tale of his greatness. A boy so scarred by life with a family 
> > that he left his home and faced starvation rather than face another day 
> > of...what?  What adult bastard caused a young boy so much pain that he 
> > needed to leave his home? And what family life life him so scarred that he 
> > led a life of homeless camping behind the KFC in the state park?  Away from 
> > people, never to be with people, to hell with people...
> > 
> > Sorry man, I get lost in that dark trance sometimes.  The miracle story 
> > manufactured from obvious neglect and probable abuse.  Plus his family was 
> > rich enough to find the kid.  Why didn't they?
> > 
> > OK back again.  Let me focus.  Judy like Guru Dev...through her dedication 
> > to hostility busting down people for, what was her last complaint about 
> > me...trying to be Mr. Wonderbread was it?  No it was close though, Mr. 
> > Wonderful, that's it.  She was taking me down for trying to present an 
> > impression that I am a wonderful human being full of the light of God and 
> > optimism that I can spread my music to the world or at least an improvement 
> > on those crappy sugary drinks pawned off as Chaipirinias in Mall bars.  I'm 
> > having a little trouble following you here although the idea that some 
> > misfortune in the past my be the shared cause for aniti-social tendencies 
> > might be a rich vein to explore...
> > 
> > > 
> > > Gotta give that which pokes ya and irks ya a deep bow just for rubbing 
> > > your nose in a crippling attachment even if the messenger is all puffy 
> > > egoic about it.
> > 
> > Yes the "petty tyrant" of Castaneda novels fame. I always gave her credit 
> > for pissing me off enough to write.  But I am not a fan of the "attachment 
> > as bad" thoery.  I am not on any path that seeks to lessen attachment, I am 
> > hungry for more of it. 
> > 
> > Anything I learned from interacting with Judy could have been accomplished 
> > without the rancorous bullshit.  That was all unnecessary IMO.  But she has 
> > picked out her sheets, the comforter with the Victorian flower print duvet 
> > cover and the edge ruffles (which seems unwise in these days of bed bug 
> > threats) and now she props herself up on no less than 15 pillows each 
> > depicting a moral lesson from the classic: I Am SO Much More Ethical Than 
> > You Are, penned by the inventor of the male chastity belt.
> >   
> > > 
> > > Except of course, unless Judy criticizes me, then I'm like you.
> > > 
> > > Sigh.....
> > 
> > The display of honesty and self-effacing truth that makes me proud to be 
> > your friend Edg.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Edg
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" 
> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Busy, busy, Sour Plum.  So much rancor to spread but the numbers of 
> > > > posts are burning so fast.  Who else needs correction, who else needs 
> > > > to be put in their place...and all around her enemies in collusion, yes 
> > > > enemies who plot to burn up her posts with things that need correction, 
> > > > so much scolding to dole out, so many personal flaws to expose to the 
> > > > innocent world which can't be trusted on its own to come to the 
> > > > righteous conclusions of the Sour Plum.  Oh and the need for hostile 
> > > > challenges just grows on all sides between the enemies plotting 
> > > > together, in collusion, and no one else can see how bad it all is, they 
> > > > must be warned but that will burn up more posts...
> > > > 
> > > > (I submit this for approval from my Dark Lord who is training me in the 
> > > > black arts of the "wisecrack".)
> > > >  
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to