And I can understand why Curtis feels so protective of him :-). He's just being a protective parent though setting a bad example to other patents..LOL..
Now Vaj is another story, he is just a crook :-) On Nov 2, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Ravi Yogi <raviy...@att.net> wrote: > Bob, > > Sure he is..this message is typical of his. But I have looked at Barry's > pictures on FB, he looks pretty naive and innocent. So he may be emotionally > a child, come across as vicious, harsh and offensive but he seems pretty > harmless. > > I'm surprised at the naïveté of some of the TM'ers and I can see why they > feel harmed by their involvement with cults and Gurus. > > So I like having him here and making fun of him. > > > On Nov 2, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Bob Price <bobpri...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> Ravi, >> >> Was this King Baby's farewell speech? >> >> That was easy. >> >> ________________________________ >> From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> >> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2011 10:34:01 AM >> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Blues >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" >> <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: >> > >> > BTW from now on, any missile Barry lobs your way is hereby >> > labeled a bang flag on a toy gun, and I will delight in >> > pointing our whether it causes you to get "freaked" about >> > it. But only to help you improve your skills understanding >> > other people's POV here. >> >> BTW from now on I doubt I will be lobbing any >> even "bang flag" missiles her way, or Robin's, >> or Bob's. I've done the "setup" for this week's >> experiment, and now they are free to react as >> they wish. Judy has only one more post this week >> in which to do so, so we'll see how attached she >> is to holding a grudge when she returns next week. >> >> It's been fun "chumming the waters" a little >> this week, but a kind of fun I will have less >> time for soon, so don't hope for more of it. >> >> When it comes to the people I have taken "bang >> flag" potshots at, I have either made my case, >> or I have not. Unlike them, I don't feel that >> repeating it ad infinitum is going to convince >> anyone of anything. They are free to continue >> to try to make any case against me they wish, >> if they'd like. As if -- if my assessment of >> them is correct -- they have any choice. :-) >> >> I really am hoping to "step away from the news- >> group" a little. As you've probably noticed, >> there is little said here that interests me >> intellectually all that much these days; I just >> can't identify with much of it. So I have (mea >> culpa) tried to fill the "interest gap" by >> perversely pushing a few easily-pushed buttons. >> But there's really no challenge even in that >> any more, since the buttons are SO easily >> pushed. Better I should do like the more >> sensible posters here and just lay low until >> and if something is said that I actually >> find interesting. >> >> Or not. We'll see... >> >> > >
