Cute babies ..:-) On Nov 2, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Bob Price <bobpri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > I agree with you; lets make them happy again---but we should be careful, they > cry so easily. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=9F3dUbqtvdc > > ________________________________ > From: Ravi Yogi <raviy...@att.net> > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2011 3:08:32 PM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Blues > > And I can understand why Curtis feels so protective of him :-). He's just > being a protective parent though setting a bad example to other patents..LOL.. > > Now Vaj is another story, he is just a crook :-) > > On Nov 2, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Ravi Yogi <raviy...@att.net> wrote: > > >Bob, > > > > > >Sure he is..this message is typical of his. But I have looked at Barry's > >pictures on FB, he looks pretty naive and innocent. So he may be emotionally > >a child, come across as vicious, harsh and offensive but he seems pretty > >harmless. > > > > > >I'm surprised at the naïveté of some of the TM'ers and I can see why they > >feel harmed by their involvement with cults and Gurus. > > > > > >So I like having him here and making fun of him. > > > > > > > >On Nov 2, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Bob Price <bobpri...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Ravi, > >> > >>Was this King Baby's farewell speech? > >> > >>That was easy. > >> > >>________________________________ > >>From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > >>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >>Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2011 10:34:01 AM > >>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Blues > >> > >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > >><curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > >>> > >>> BTW from now on, any missile Barry lobs your way is hereby > >>> labeled a bang flag on a toy gun, and I will delight in > >>> pointing our whether it causes you to get "freaked" about > >>> it. But only to help you improve your skills understanding > >>> other people's POV here. > >> > >>BTW from now on I doubt I will be lobbing any > >>even "bang flag" missiles her way, or Robin's, > >>or Bob's. I've done the "setup" for this week's > >>experiment, and now they are free to react as > >>they wish. Judy has only one more post this week > >>in which to do so, so we'll see how attached she > >>is to holding a grudge when she returns next week. > >> > >>It's been fun "chumming the waters" a little > >>this week, but a kind of fun I will have less > >>time for soon, so don't hope for more of it. > >> > >>When it comes to the people I have taken "bang > >>flag" potshots at, I have either made my case, > >>or I have not. Unlike them, I don't feel that > >>repeating it ad infinitum is going to convince > >>anyone of anything. They are free to continue > >>to try to make any case against me they wish, > >>if they'd like. As if -- if my assessment of > >>them is correct -- they have any choice. :-) > >> > >>I really am hoping to "step away from the news- > >>group" a little. As you've probably noticed, > >>there is little said here that interests me > >>intellectually all that much these days; I just > >>can't identify with much of it. So I have (mea > >>culpa) tried to fill the "interest gap" by > >>perversely pushing a few easily-pushed buttons. > >>But there's really no challenge even in that > >>any more, since the buttons are SO easily > >>pushed. Better I should do like the more > >>sensible posters here and just lay low until > >>and if something is said that I actually > >>find interesting. > >> > >>Or not. We'll see... > >> > >> > >> > >
